
Soil and Groundwater Contamination Survey and Countermeasure Technologies
| Category of Tchnology | Treatment | Counterplan Technology | |
| Media | Soil | ||
| Contaminants |
|
||
| Applied (Demonstrated) Substances | Mercury | ||
| Scope | Concentration Range | Contaminated soil containing 20-1,000 ppm as mercury | |
| Hydrogeological Conditions |
|
|
|
| Chemical Soil Properties | |||
| Other Remarks | |||
| Technology Description | Classification | Separation | |
| Status |
|
||
| Outline of Technology | The excavated contaminated soil is heated indirectly, and is brought to contact with heated steam (300-800°C), thus letting the contaminants vaporize and remove from the soil to clean the contaminated soil. The emitted contaminants are treated by a flue gas treatment system containing a bag filter, a condenser, a scrubber, an activated carbon adsorber and a catalytic oxidizing reactor. The condensate containing the contaminants is treated by a waste water treatment unit. | ||
| Required Pre- and Post-treatment | As the pre-treatment system, granules and stones having sizes of 20mm or more are removed. As for the post-treatment system, the emitted contaminants are treated by a flue gas treatment unit, and the condensate containing the contaminants generated during the flue gas treatment is treated by a waste water treatment unit. | ||
| Enhance Effectiveness through Combination | |||
| Case History | In each stage of bench scale test and of on-site pilot plant demonstration test, contaminated soils containing 20-1,000 ppm of mercury were treated to obtain 98.8-99.999% of mercury removal rate. Elution test of the treated-soil did not show elution of mercury. The mercury concentration of the flue gas after the treatment was 15 ug/m3 or less,(15µg/m3 is the limit of WHO). The concentrate containing mercury was treated by coagulation sedimentation, activated carbon adsorption, and chelate resin adsorption to give mercury concentrations of 0.0005mg/l or less, (0.005mg/l is the limit of environmental regulation). In the bench scale test, the mass balance of mercury was established. In the pilot plant test, however, about 50% of the mercury was lost unidentified in the mass balance. | ||
| Application Examples | Dealing with mercury-contaminated soils sampled from chemical plant areas, a pilot plant having a capacity of 100kg/h conducted cleaning demonstration tests. | ||
| Limitations | There needs a heat source such as city gas to supply heated steam. | ||
| Properties of Treated Soil | Possibility of Change in Properties | ||
| Schematic Flow Process | ![]() |
||
| Applicability | In Situ Applicability | Possible | |
| Ground Structures | |||
| Required Excavation | Excavated soil is treated (To be applied to excavated soil) | ||
| Groundwater Extraction | |||
| Required Space | Area of about eight trailer trucks is required for the on-site pilot plant test. | ||
| Operational Time | |||
| Installation Time | |||
| Maintenance and Control Requirements | |||
| Additional Remarks | A heat source to supply heated steam is required. | ||
| Secondary Impacts to Environment | Secondary Treatment Required? | ||
| Effects on Living Environment | |||
| Additives | Others (steam) | ||
| Possibility of Contaminant Spreading | None | ||
| Secondary By-products | Regarding the ingredients existing in the contaminated soil, there is a need to check the possibility of non-intentional generation of toxic substances. | ||
Soil Environment Management Division, Water Environment Department, Environmental Management Bureau, Ministry of Environment
Tel: +81-3-5521-8319
E-mail: MOE@env.go.jp