Soil and Groundwater Contamination Survey and Countermeasure Technologies



Electromigration Technology for Clean-up Soil Contaminated with Heavy Metals
 
Category of Tchnology Treatment  In Situ Extraction Technology
Media Soil, Groundwater
Contaminants
  • Heavy Metal (Cd, Pb, As, Hg, Se, etc)
  • Materilas for which application of technology is highly possible (although not verified) or application of technology is indicated in documents published overseasInorganic Compounds (total CN, etc)
  • Reducible Inorganic Compounds (Cr6+, etc)
  • Materilas for which application of technology is highly possible (although not verified) or application of technology is indicated in documents published overseasVolatile Chlorinated Organic Compounds (TCE, PCE, etc)
  • Materilas for which application of technology is highly possible (although not verified) or application of technology is indicated in documents published overseasVolatile Hydrocarbon (Benzene, etc)
Applied (Demonstrated) Substances Pb, As
Scope Concentration Range  
Hydrogeological Conditions
  • Saturated
  • Unsaturated
  • Permeable Layer
Chemical Soil Properties Care should be taken when high concentration of chloride is contained in soils.
Other Remarks  
Technology Description Classification  
Status
  • Under Demonstration
  • Soil and Groundwater Countermeasure Test Study (Performed 1997)
Outline of Technology Direct current causes the migration of cations migrate to the cathod and anions to the anode in moist soils.  This is applied to contaminated soils to collect heavy metals near the electrodes and remove from soils.  The electrodes used in the demonstration test was covered with semipermeable membranes and EDTA added in the membrane cell was circulated in the system and picked up heavy metals.  Two actual contaminated soils, Pb and As, were treated with use of a small and a medium size electrolytic cells.
Required Pre- and Post-treatment Treatment of the extracted metals (ion exchange resin adsorption was used in the demonstration test)
Enhance Effectiveness through Combination  
Case History Removal of 3%/day of Pb from 5,300 mg/kg-soil, 1.5%/day of Pb from 1,000 mg/kg-soil and 1.5%/day of As from 1,800 mg/kg-soil was demonstrated.
Application Examples Commercially applied in Europe and U.S.
Limitations Impermeable walls may be needed when applied in unsaturated zone.
Properties of Treated Soil Properties are Generally Retained
Schematic Flow Process
Principle of Electromigration 
Applicability In Situ Applicability Possible
Ground Structures Materilas for which application of technology is highly possible (although not verified) or application of technology is indicated in documents published overseasNot Applicable
Required Excavation May need the excavation for cut-off wall installation.
Groundwater Extraction  
Required Space  
Operational Time  
Installation Time  
Maintenance and Control Requirements Management of EDTA solution (ion exchange columns were used in the test.
Additional Remarks Sufficient soil flushing is needed to remove residual extrant (EDTA) after the electrode withdrawal.
Secondary Impacts to Environment Secondary Treatment Required? Effluent Water Treatment
Effects on Living Environment  
Additives
  • Water
  • Others (EDTA solution)
  • Possibility of Contaminant Spreading None
    Secondary By-products Chlorine gas may be generated when the medium contains high concentration of chloride.
    (July 2002)
    Contents Search by Keywords Other Databases GEC Homepage


    Copyright(C) Ministry of the Environment of Japan. All Rights Reserved.
    Maintained by Global Environment Centre Foundation