
Soil and Groundwater Contamination Survey and Countermeasure Technologies
| Category of Tchnology | Treatment | In Situ Extraction Technology | |
| Media | Groundwater, Soil Gas | ||
| Contaminants |
|
||
| Applied (Demonstrated) Substances | Toluene, PCe, TCE, Carbon-Tetrachloride | ||
| Scope | Concentration Range | higher concentration | |
| Hydrogeological Conditions |
|
|
|
| Chemical Soil Properties | |||
| Other Remarks | It can be regarded as an in-situ air stripping, and groundwater
is no more needed to be pumped up.
In US and in Europe, it’s expected to promote aerobic biodegradation as it injects air into groundwater. |
||
| Technology Description | Classification | ||
| Status |
|
||
| Outline of Technology | As an analogy to Soil Vapor Extraction. Air Sparging involves injection of air into unsaturated soil and/or groundwater which is contaminated with VOC’s, excites airflow through soil pore volume and promotes volatilization of contaminant. Injected air is recovered as soil gas, contributes to the remediation. | ||
| Required Pre- and Post-treatment | More volume of air is required to be recovered than injected, and some treatment is needed for the recovered air for discharge. | ||
| Enhance Effectiveness through Combination | |||
| Case History | In a perched water contaminated with Toluene and TCE (the
geology is volcanic ash clay, the depth from GL is -3.9 ~ -5.15m), 0.12
~ 0.56 [m3/min] of air for each is injected through 3 injection
well and 0.18 ~ 0.87 [m3/min] of air for each is recovered through
3 extraction wells.
Total of 3.47 [kg] of contaminant was recovered in the test operation of 184.8 [hr]. (quantity of the collected air this time was 19g/hour). Radius of influence of the injected air was estimated to be roughly 2m by an observation of the groundwater mounding. |
||
| Application Examples | Commonly applied to treatment of VOC contaminated sites in US and in Europe. | ||
| Limitations | Permeability of the media is required to be
high.
For some sites with high groundwater flowrate, countermeasures are required to restrict migration of contaminated groundwater. |
||
| Properties of Treated Soil |
|
||
| Schematic Flow Process |
The Location of Injections and Extraction Wells |
||
| Applicability | In Situ Applicability | Possible | |
| Ground Structures | Applicable even if Ground Structures are Present | ||
| Required Excavation | A little amount of soil excavation is required to install injection wells, extraction wells and monitoring well. | ||
| Groundwater Extraction | Sometimes, required to countermeasure to the migration of contaminated groundwater. | ||
| Required Space | Usually, 20 - 50 m2 | ||
| Operational Time | Possibly, shorter than the conventional pump and treat. | ||
| Installation Time | |||
| Maintenance and Control Requirements | As well as measurement of injection / extraction flowrate and contaminant concentration in extracted soil gas, monitoring of contaminant concentration in adjacent groundwater and soil gas is necessary. | ||
| Additional Remarks | |||
| Secondary Impacts to Environment | Secondary Treatment Required? | ||
| Effects on Living Environment | Noise | ||
| Additives | Air | ||
| Possibility of Contaminant Spreading | Migration of Contaminated soil gas’s possible unless proper design and operation of soil gas extraction system | ||
| Secondary By-products | None | ||
Soil Environment Management Division, Water Environment Department, Environmental Management Bureau, Ministry of Environment
Tel: +81-3-5521-8319
E-mail: MOE@env.go.jp